When I visited the memorial at Pearl Harbor, I briefly wondered if the Japanese were simply suicidal.

Why start an uncertain battle with a much more powerful opponent?

Japan’s leaders knew the US military was far superior when they attacked Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7, 1941. The attack killed over 2,400 people and brought the US into World War 2.

But Japan’s leaders had a powerful reason to gamble with their nation’s fate…

Access to energy.

For Japan—an island nation totally dependent on imports—access to oil was a matter of life and death. The country needed to secure its energy supply. That made attacking Pearl Harbor a practical proposition.

Turns out, the Japanese thought not attacking Pearl Harbor was suicidal.

Here’s why…

In the early ’40s, Japan had big plans to dominate East Asia. The imperial Japanese military was on the march. And the US was the only country that could stop it.

The US wanted to block Tokyo and protect its geopolitical position in the region. So it moved to restrict Japan’s access to oil, which Japan needed to feed its economy and war machine.

Not surprisingly, the Japanese considered this hostile and aggressive. The US government didn’t expect it to provoke an attack, though.

Recommended Link

A Biotech Breakthrough 7 Times Bigger than the Cancer Industry?

On December 19th, an FDA anomaly could launch a new breakthrough biotech industry 35,000%… Making it seven times bigger than the cancer drug industry and crowning it the new king of biotech medicine. Click here to see this FDA anomaly exposed.

The Assistant Secretary of State for Economic Affairs at the time, Dean Acheson, said, “No rational Japanese could believe that an attack on us could result in anything but disaster for his country.”

The Japanese disagreed.

They knew they would run out of vital commodities soon. So they had two choices… let the US slowly strangle their country and ultimately surrender… or take their chances on a risky war against a vastly superior opponent.

In Japan’s samurai culture, surrender was the ultimate disgrace.

Death in battle was better. So they chose option two. It was the only honorable choice.

Japan’s leaders thought the Pearl Harbor attack could knock the US Navy out of the Pacific for at least six months. This would give Japan a sizable window to secure its energy sources without US interference—and to fortify its military positions across the Pacific.

By the time the US could respond, it would face a deeply embedded opponent and decide it was best to leave East Asia to Japan.

That was Tokyo’s plan, at least.

In reality, Japan did successfully capture Singapore from the British. It was an enormous victory. Winston Churchill called it the “worst disaster” in British military history.

And, after a string of big wins during their six-month window, the Japanese were entrenched. They appeared unbeatable. Their leaders hoped this would sap US morale so much that Washington would seek a compromise.

But President Roosevelt did not want to compromise.

Many believe he was actually waiting for the perfect pretext to sell a hesitant US public on another world war. Some even claim the US had deciphered Japan’s military code and knew the Pearl Harbor attack was coming.

In any case, the Japanese could not have been more wrong. Ultimately, their decision to strike Pearl Harbor culminated in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, total defeat, and unconditional surrender. Even today, the US still maintains military bases in Japan.

Today, Japan is in the midst of another energy security crisis.

Right now, it depends on imports for over 90% of its energy needs. Tokyo won’t go to war over it this time. But this crisis could lead to enormous profits in the world’s most hated resource market.

Earlier this year I traveled over 25,000 miles to Japan—and Kazakhstan—to find out how to profit from this historic opportunity.

Recommended Link

Cali Legalizing Recreational Marijuana
On January 1 there will be a marijuana boom 8x bigger than anything we’ve seen before. Get the whole story here.

The World’s Most Hated Commodity

On March 11, 2011, one of the largest earthquakes in history hit off the coast of Japan. The earthquake, and the tsunami that followed, killed thousands of people and caused over $200 billion in damage.

The tsunami also caused a nuclear meltdown at Japan’s Fukushima power plant, which released radioactivity into the air. It was the worst (and only) nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Afterward, Japan took all 54 of its nuclear reactors offline.

Japan suddenly needed a major new source of energy.

The country has a law dating back to the 1970s that requires it to stockpile at least five years’ worth of energy supplies. Uranium, which fuels nuclear power plants, is the only feasible way for Japan to do that. It’s simply not practical for Japan to stockpile enough coal, oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG), etc.

For now, Japan is making an emergency exception to its five-year law because of Fukushima. But this puts it in a very vulnerable geopolitical position, especially since tensions with China, its historical rival, are increasing.

The Japanese know that relying on the kindness of foreigners for their energy security is foolhardy. This situation can’t continue indefinitely.

Eventually, Japan will have to bring most of its nuclear power plants back online. However, restarting idled plants is not as simple as flipping a switch. And, with LNG prices near recent lows, they haven’t had an immediate need to do so.

Nonetheless, Japan recently stated that it would like nuclear power to account for as much as 22% of its energy mix by 2030.

Japan is just one factor driving the coming uranium boom.

Even if Japanese demand for uranium doesn’t return soon, the enormous amount of new demand from China’s new nuclear plants will more than offset it.

Before Fukushima, Japan was a major source of demand for uranium. The country had embraced nuclear energy in the 1960s, despite being devastated by nuclear weapons in World War 2.

Not surprisingly, global demand for uranium tanked after Fukushima. A global supply glut followed.

The uranium price crashed from around $85 to under $30. Then it continued sliding to around $18 per pound, far below the cost of production.

That was last November, and it appears to have been the bottom.

That same month, I said uranium had entered a new bull market and recommended a “best of breed” uranium company in Crisis Investing.

Uranium is now on a confirmed uptrend, but it’s still far below the cost of production. It’s still near the moment of maximum pessimism.

No other commodity has more upside and less downside right now.

The uranium market is one of the best crisis investing opportunities I’ve ever seen.

Psychology plays a big part in all this. After Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and of course Fukushima, it’s easy for certain media and politicians to villainize uranium.

Besides that, investors are terrified that uranium prices have fallen over 85% from previous highs. I don’t know of a market where the sentiment is worse.

This is all good news for us.

The whole point of investing in crisis markets is to take advantage of the aberrations of mass psychology and pick up elite companies and assets for pennies on the dollar. This describes the current opportunity in the uranium market perfectly.

Nuclear power delivers immense value to its users, there’s no substitute for it, and production is falling while demand rises.

This situation only has two possible outcomes:

  1. Uranium prices don’t go up. Miners have no incentive to produce. Nuclear power plants run out of uranium, and the lights go out for billions of people.
  2. Uranium prices go up and incentivize enough production to meet the demand.

There are no other options. Which one do you think is more likely?

Right now, the current uranium supply/demand imbalance is setting the stage for the next uranium boom.

Now is the time to get positioned for the same kind of explosive returns we’ve seen in previous uranium bull markets.

Until next time,


Nick Giambruno
Senior Editor, International Man

A few words are in order about the likely new Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell.

I don’t know the man personally. Not that it would make any difference; denizens of the swamp within the Beltway usually present well, and a brief meeting rarely allows you to penetrate someone’s social veneer. But I’m pretty confident that if we dined together it would be tense and unpleasant. We’d have no common ground, after the obligatory two minutes on the weather and the state of the roads.

He’s a lawyer, has been a Fed Governor for five years, and appears to be a “steady as she goes” so-called moderate Republican. He’s a lifelong Deep State player. But let’s not waste time psychoanalyzing this bureaucrat; he’s just a cog in the machine. And the machine, at this stage, has a life of its own.

Recommended Link

Kansas farm boy generates millions from his California “bunker”
He’s just an ordinary guy born on a farm in Kansas. He didn’t graduate from a fancy college. He doesn’t have an MBA. Yet he stumbled upon a “secret key” technique that allowed him to retire at 42… and still make more money in 8 hours… than most people make in a month. He calls it his retirement hobby. Click here to see his “secret key” in action.

Many of my friends in the alternative press deplore Trump’s appointment of yet another conventional money printer. They were hoping for a “hawk,” who would start liquidating the Fed’s $4.5 trillion balance sheet, and raising interest rates. And they’re right. That $4.5 trillion of super money has driven stock, bond, and real estate prices to insane levels. And today’s artificially low interest rates are discouraging saving, and encouraging people to live above their means.

In an ideal world there would be some radical changes. The best thing for the US in the (famous) long run is to go “cold turkey.” To abolish the Federal Reserve, fire its thousands of employees with their worthless PhDs. Return to 100% reserve banking with a strict separation of demand and time deposits. Depoliticize money by using gold, not Federal Reserve Notes. And default on the national debt, which is rewarding crony capitalists, and will turn future generations of Americans into serfs. And massively deregulate. And abolish the income tax, while cutting spending 90%. Etc. Etc.

The chances of that happening are exactly zero. So let’s talk, instead, about what is going to happen.

We’re going to have much higher levels of inflation. The new Fed Chair will open a monetary hydrant, at least if he doesn’t want to be hung from a lamppost by his heels. But I’m quite pleased Trump has appointed the guy. That may sound shocking. Let me explain why.

A sound economist would work to stop money printing and let interest rates find a market level. But that would precipitate a deflationary collapse after decades of monetary debasement. And the powers of darkness would again be able to paint sound policies and the free market as the cause for the problem, when actually it’s the only cure for economic problems.

From an economic point of view an inflationist like Powell is a disaster. It’s too bad he’s nominally a Republican, since for some reason they’re associated with the free market. As is Trump. Wearing our speculator hats, we’d likely be better off under Hillary—even more inflation, even more distortions to capitalize on. Even wearing our economist hats we might be better off under her, because if the whole rotten structure collapsed on her watch, it might discredit her ideas for at least a few years. But, as ever, I suspect I’m being too optimistic.

Recommended Link

How You Can Profit from Doug Casey’s “Biggest Speculation in History”
Best-selling investment author, financial commentator, and millionaire speculator Doug Casey invites you to join him in his first-ever exclusive FREE online masterclass… Register now for FREE (and get the name of three stocks to watch from Doug’s watch list)

For decades—at least since I started following these things in the early ‘70s—free market economists have argued whether the Fed’s ever-increasing money printing would result in a deflationary depression, or a hyperinflationary depression.

As to why a catastrophic depression is inevitable—despite the fact most people try to produce more than they consume, and despite the fact science and technology are advancing exponentially—is beyond the scope of this brief article. I refer you to these pieces (here and here ) I’ve done in the past on that topic.

It will be a deflationary collapse if the Fed doesn’t continue buying debt and creating new dollars. And a hyperinflation if they do.

If they stop printing, the banks would fail, and the public would lose a good portion of their deposits. The economy would slow down considerably, causing indebted corporations to default, unemploying their workers. Tax revenues would fall off, and governments wouldn’t be able to fund welfare programs. The stock, bond and real estate markets would collapse, wiping out the asset base of rich people.

It would be a huge social upset. But most of the real wealth in the world would still exist, it’s just that a lot of it would change ownership. And the dollar would still exist—there’d just be many fewer of them. Production and commerce could continue. At least until the cries go out for the government to “do something.”

But hyperinflation will be an even bigger disaster. And that’s what we’re going to get. Money will drop radically in value, making production and consumption much, much harder. Foreigners will dump trillions of them, sending them back to the US in exchange for real wealth. There’ll be even more unemployment than with deflation. But the profligate—those who’d borrowed a lot to live above their means—will be rewarded, while prudent savers will be punished. Shaky, overindebted corporations might survive, while productive ones with fat balance sheets will lose. Worse, governments will have their debts erased, and therefore might even grow in power. They’ll definitely “do something,” they always do in time of chaos. Stocks and real estate could first crash, then soar as people try to get out of dollars and into assets. This will benefit the rich, at least in relative terms.

At this late stage either type of depression will result in not just financial and economic, but in social and political chaos. It won’t be fun. In a depression everybody loses. The winners are just those who lose least. And a few speculators that get lucky. Hopefully we’ll be among them.

Given a choice—and they have a choice, based on whether they keep printing or not—the government and the Fed will definitely veer towards more inflation. Everyone in office just hopes to kick the can down the road for at least one more cycle.

Frankly, I was surprised that things didn’t go over a cliff in 2008 when we entered this most recent hurricane. And I’ve been surprised that things have held together as well as they have during the long “eye of the storm.” But governments and central banks around the world have already printed up scores of trillions of new currency units, and reduced interest rates to zero and below. What can they do when we go into the trailing edge of the hurricane?

My guess is that they’ll repeat their actions so far. Print more money and try to take interest rates even lower. The result will be hyperinflation, or close to it. And lots of new government controls of all types.

Why is this—strictly relatively speaking—good news for us? Because more money printing means more bubbles will be created. And while bubbles are the enemies of a sound economy, they’re the friend of the speculator. The current mania in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is an example.

In particular, I’m looking forward to a bubble in commodities in general (most are down 50% from the previous peak in 2011), and precious metals in particular. And not just a bubble, but a hyper bubble in mining stocks.

So, if I’m right, in the next few years we could stand to make a fortune while the world is falling apart. I know—that sounds harsh to be eating caviar while the masses are forced to grub for roots and berries. But, as Ayn Rand said when asked what you should do about the poor: “Just make sure you’re not one of them.”

Regards,

Doug Casey
Founder, Casey Research

Nick’s Note: Todd Scattini isn’t your typical marijuana entrepreneur.

He graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1996, and became an Army officer.

But Todd recently hung up his fatigues to serve as CEO of Harvest 360, a marijuana consulting and management firm.

My colleague Justin Spittler, editor of the Casey Daily Dispatch, met Todd at Harvest 360’s headquarters in Denver a few weeks ago. There, they discussed how he’s using cannabis to solve one of the military’s deadliest problems.

Todd’s story could completely change how many people think about cannabis.

Below is a transcript of their conversation. I encourage you to share it with anyone who still sees marijuana as just another “street drug.” It may just change their mind…


Justin: Todd, I’m not used to seeing “cannabis” and “Army officer” in the same sentence. So, can you tell me how you became interested in the plant?

Todd: I became interested in 2011. I was in Paris at the time, and I was asked to serve as a special advisor for General John Allen. He was the Commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) back then.

ISAF was a NATO-led security mission. It’s the largest military coalition ever assembled. At the time, it was 51 nations.

Its main purpose was training the Afghan National Security Forces and assisting Afghanistan in rebuilding key government institutions. It was also engaged in the war with the Taliban insurgency.

I was helping manage the General’s relationship with the Coalition through bilateral engagement and normal security cooperation functions.

One evening, our special staff was asked to come up with creative ways to engage with the Afghans using the domestic resources they had so that they could create an industry without relying on outside assistance.

And I thought, “Geez. The Afghans don’t have many resources.”

Recommended Link

Marijuana Is the Fastest-Growing Industry in the World
The cannabis industry is growing faster than high-tech companies during the dot-com boom. Lawyers, scientists, and executives are pouring in. Landlords in this industry make up to 260% more revenue. Farmers bring in 10 times more money. Retail stores have higher revenue per square foot than Whole Foods stores. No wonder the best marijuana stocks averaged 29,000% peak gains. But when California legalizes recreational pot on January 1, it’s expected to unleash the biggest marijuana boom in history. Fortunes will be made. Click here to find out more on 3 of the hottest stocks in the world’s fastest-growing industry.

They had minerals, but the Chinese had purchased the rights to them long ago, and it would take nearly a decade to build the infrastructure to mine them effectively.

They had heroin, too, but I certainly didn’t think that could be the basis for an industry.

And they had cannabis. A lot of cannabis that they grew was smuggled outside of the country and sold on the black market for huge profits to fund terrorist operations.

So, I thought, “why don’t we transition them to a hemp industry?” It has 25,000 different uses such as food, fuel, fiber, and medicine. And humans have been using it for 8,000 years. We have essentially evolved with this plant.

Justin: How’d that suggestion go over with your supervisors?

Todd: It was not well-received. I don’t believe my concept was ever even briefed to the General. I was kind of laughed out of the room, to be honest. They called me “Major Cheech & Chong” and things like that.

But I learned so much about the plant by studying it, including its medical potential.

And I thought, “there are some military applications here.”

So, I continued to read, study, and talk to everyone I could about the plant. I learned so much that I became a master at talking to generals, other officers, and ambassadors about marijuana.

Justin: So, do they still call you Major Cheech & Chong?

Todd: I still get a giggle or pot pun when I talk about it. But I’m no longer laughed out of the room. So, yes, I’ve convinced a lot of people that this is a very interesting proposition and might be a way to address reducing suicides from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and chronic pain; all significant issues that often result from our service.

Justin: How did you change people’s minds?

Todd: I just became so passionate and well-studied about the plant, the roots of its prohibition, and its potential to help people.

So, now when speaking with generals and other senior leaders I tell them, “Sir, this is serious, and I think it could save soldiers’ lives.”

I always point them to the federal government’s patent on cannabidiol as a neuro-protectant, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant. This is U.S. Patent 6630507.

Justin: Why’s that patent so important?

Todd: These days, many of our soldiers encounter improvised explosive devices (IED) on the battlefield. An IED strike can be devastating to multiple vehicles and soldiers in an instant.

And, if an IED goes off near you, there’s a good chance you’ll experience a TBI. TBI is a very serious concussion possibly leading to permanent or temporary impairment of cognitive, physical, and psychosocial function. We find that soldiers who have experienced a TBI are at a higher risk for PTSD and suicide.

Justin: How does an IED give TBI?

Todd: When an IED goes off near you, there’s a massive blast wave. The air from the blast creates a wall of pressure that hits a soldier’s hard skull and rattles the soft brain around inside of it, and a dangerous chemical process begins inside the skull.

This can lead to a stroke, which is what usually kills a TBI victim.

Recommended Link

December 19th could be the start of a medical revolution.

“These FANG stocks already hit the top, but there’s a new industry just starting to make its way up”

Early investors in the four tech industries above likely became millionaires as innovative breakthroughs disrupted their fields… Today, there’s only one breakthrough capable of upending the market… It’s what I call the “God Key” and it’s expected to grow by 35,000% in the coming years.

Click here to get details behind which companies could make the biggest gains in this brand-new sector.

Justin: How does the military currently treat TBI?

Todd: Today, there’s very little done to treat it. And, aside from improvements made to some vehicles, there’s really no protocol for preventing this sort of injury.

I want to change that with my project, The Athena Protocol.

I want to use formulations of non-psychoactive cannabinoids (especially cannabidiol) and a few added elements as a daily supplement to essentially “armor a soldier’s brain,” and help protect the brain’s neuroreceptors. Studies suggest that this approach could also increase the elasticity of the neurons, preventing them from calcification and potentially reducing the instance of PTSD among our soldier and veteran population.

Justin: How do you plan to prevent these sorts of things?

Todd: Well, we do this in two phases. The first is the prep phase. This happens “left of the boom,” as we say in the military. This means this is the preparation done prior to an IED strike. This includes the supplementation of cannabinoids which help “armor the brain” in preparation for a traumatic event.

Hopefully no one ever gets “right of the boom,” or experiences an IED strike. But, if they do, I would propose administering an immediate supplemental dose of non-psychoactive cannabinoids and other elements very, very rapidly.

Justin: What made you want to focus on TBI?

Todd: I became interested after I lost a platoon leader of mine. His name was Captain Andrew Houghton.

Andy was a fellow West Point graduate. He was class of 2001, and he was like a little brother to me.

In 2004, he was struck in the head with a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) while deployed in Iraq. The RPG didn’t explode. But it did massive damage to his head.

The battlefield medics, which are so good today, performed a soldier-to-soldier blood transfusion on-site in his vehicle. They stabilized him in-country and transported him to the Army hospital in Germany.

There, his brain continued to swell.

The rocket did so much damage that they had to remove a large portion of his brain to release the pressure. He was then sent to Walter Reed Medical Center in Washington, D.C., where I was present when they pinned a Purple Heart on him. He passed away the next day.

If I can prevent something like that from happening again, I will be very satisfied and feel that I will have done my duty.

Justin: I’m terribly sorry to hear about your loss, Todd.

But it’s inspiring that you’re trying to prevent this sort of thing from happening to other soldiers.

That said, how can you be so confident that The Athena Protocol will work? After all, no one’s ever done anything like this before.

Todd: So, a portion of that is the federal patent I was telling you about. This study says cannabidiol is an effective neuroprotectant and anti-inflammatory.

More recent studies have also shown that victims of car accidents who have THC (an active ingredient in marijuana) have a higher percentage of survivability in TBI incidents.

Plus, we know that cannabinoids pass the blood barrier much more rapidly than most pharmaceuticals.

So, we’d be able to administer and see anti-inflammatory effects very rapidly.

But, you are right. Of course, this theory must be tested. The unfortunate thing is that we are prevented from testing this in the United States due to cannabis’ Schedule I status on the federal government’s list of Controlled Substances. I would propose to circumvent this by studying this outside of the U.S. or gaining special permission to do so in the U.S.

Justin: Would The Athena Protocol only be used to treat TBI injuries suffered in combat? Or are there applications beyond the military?

Todd: Absolutely. Soldiers aren’t the only ones who suffer TBI injuries. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2.5 million people go to U.S. emergency rooms every year for TBI. And about 300,000 of those people die from their injuries.

This includes everyone from car crash victims to people who slip and fall.

So, this kind of treatment could really be used everywhere. And the sooner first responders and hospitals can administer this, the better.

Justin: And how’s the project coming along?

Todd: Right now, we’re at the research and development (R&D) level, but we have submitted for a provisional patent for the entire protocol and sub-patents for each formulation and method of administration. Specifically, we’re working on jamming as much cannabidiol into a single drop of water as possible. And we’ve already gotten some incredibly high levels of concentration. So, it’s coming along very nicely.

Justin: Got it. You’re doing some incredible work, Todd. But I have to ask you one last thing before I let you go… Where’d the name, The Athena Protocol, come from?

Todd: The name, and I’m not kidding, came to me in the middle of the night. I shot out of bed and wrote it down.

Athena is the Greek Goddess of Wisdom, Good Counsel, and War. She also wears a helmet. And Athena’s helmet adorns the West Point crest.

Justin: Wow. It sure seems like you picked the perfect name.

Thank you for taking the time to speak with me. And best of luck with everything.

Over the years, I’ve often been asked to explain the political party system in a simple, easy-to-grasp way. Several years ago, I came up with the following explanation, and, for some people, it’s helped to remove the complexity and smoke and mirrors created by the political world. Let’s see if you agree.

Picture this: You live in a relatively small town. It’s a good place to live, with most townspeople being mutually supportive and often quite helpful. There are just a few local restaurants, each owned and operated by your fellow townsmen. You go out to eat often, to support your community.

Then, one day, in an old brick commercial building in the centre of town, with two vacant storefronts, you see signs announcing the opening of a new pizza shop in one of the vacant spaces. It will be called “Blue Pizza.”

When it opens, the manager advises customers that the owner is a staunch blue party supporter, and, each month, the owner plans to dedicate much of the profits from the shop to blue candidates. You vote blue in each election, so, you make a point of frequenting the shop and feel good that your meals are benefitting the blue party.

Recommended Link

The California Green Rush will make Colorado’s marijuana market look like a tiny blip
On January 1, recreational marijuana will be legal in California. Virtually overnight, the marijuana market could DOUBLE and California will sell almost 50% of all legal U.S. pot. And the U.S. pot market is expected to grow from $6.5 billion to $50 billion by 2026. This once-in-a-lifetime event can send marijuana stocks through the roof. Get the whole story here.

Soon, many of the other blue supporters in town flock to the shop, regularly buying pizza. Red supporters, however, are a bit disgruntled and rarely go in for a pizza.

Then, one day, signs appear in the other vacant storefront, announcing the opening of “Red Pizza.” It’s immediately popular with red party voters, as the manager advises customers that the owner intends to donate a major portion of the profits to red party candidates.

Although the owners never seem to be present, the two managers are quite vocal regarding the political support by their respective shops. Soon, business increases dramatically for both pizza shops. Half the town frequents Blue Pizza; the other half frequents Red Pizza. Townspeople go as often as possible, wanting to lend as much support as they can.

Over time, the pre-existing local restaurants are having a hard time making ends meet, as they’re seeing far fewer customers. One by one, they fold. Townspeople regret the closures, but, with each closure, they increase their commitment to their chosen pizza shop.

Each group of patrons insists that its shop’s pizza is better pizza, and rumours begin to circulate that the other shop serves pizza with substandard ingredients that are unhealthy. The other pizza is not only less desirable, but a danger to the community.

As each election time approaches, townspeople go all out, ordering pizza as often as they can, in order to help their chosen candidates to get elected. Altercations often break out between younger customers, on the street in front of the shops.

The townspeople become divided like never before. A resident, who once got on fairly well with his neighbour, now looks at him with resentment and even anger, when he sees him enter the opposing shop. The townspeople become highly polarized and begin to see each other as the enemy. Although actual violence is minimal, the former sense of community, in which neighbours looked after one another, deteriorates.

People in the workplace find that they’re taking up sides far more than they once did, and, in the same place of work, blue and red groupings often define whether co-workers can work together effectively.

Recommended Link

A Biotech Breakthrough 7 Times Bigger than the Cancer Industry?

On December 19th, an FDA anomaly could launch a new breakthrough biotech industry 35,000%… Making it seven times bigger than the cancer drug industry and crowning it the new king of biotech medicine. Click here to see this FDA anomaly exposed.

One day, someone from out of town is visiting for a few days. He’s intrigued by the considerable business being done by the two pizza shops and the polarization that’s developed in the once-harmonious town.

Out of curiosity, he goes to each shop and orders a slice of pizza. He’s surprised to find that they look and taste exactly the same.

He then visits the real estate office that handles the building and asks the realtor if any other space has been rented in the building recently. The realtor mentions that the office space above the two shops was rented at about the same time as the shops themselves.

That night, at closing time for the two pizza shops, the visitor sits on a bench across the street from the shops, staring at the building. A local notices him and asks, “What are you looking at?”

The visitor says, “I’m waiting to see what happens. Have a seat.”

The local sits down and they both stare at the front of the brick building. Eventually, they see the manager of Blue Pizza shut off the lights, lock up the front door, and enter the door that leads to the upstairs office. Moments later, the manager of Red Pizza does the same.

The two people on the bench stare into the lighted office above the pizza shops, where a man, presumably the owner, sits at a desk. As the managers arrive upstairs, they place their proceeds from the day into one pile. The three men count out the money, and the owner makes a record of the total take for the day. They then sit back, have a beer, and joke together. The owner places the proceeds into his valise and the three men exit the building, driving away in separate directions.

And that’s essentially the system of democracy.

In bygone eras, kings ruled vast areas of countryside. They fed off the people and were understandably resented and even hated by them.

Then, along came democracy. It was often created from the bottom up, by a people who were fed up at having their lives ruled by usurpers who allowed them few choices and limited opportunity.

But, in virtually every country, the system was co-opted by those who sought power. Not surprisingly, they sought power for their own gain, not the benefit of the people. (’Twas ever thus.)

Ironically, the democratic system has been far more effective for the rulers than the monarchic system. By creating the illusion that the people have a choice, the rulers and their flunkies can extract far more from the people, without inciting revolt, than was previously possible in the monarchic system.

Political leaders are therefore far more loyal to the system than they are to those who voted for them.

A thousand years ago, in the “dark” ages, a worker paid his tithe to the feudal lord. The standard tithe was “one day’s labour in ten,” or ten percent of his earnings. Today, although the average serf has modern distractions, such as smart phones and flat-screen TVs, he pays a far higher percentage of the fruits of his labour in an endless plethora of federal, state, and local taxes and government departmental fees.

For both Blue Pizza and Red Pizza, revenue has never been better, and the cost of a slice is certain to rise further.

Hopefully the lesson to be learned is to avoid being distracted by the colour of the pizza shop, but to focus instead on the fellow in the office above.

Regards,

Nick Giambruno: The story of Paladin Energy is a great example of why I’m so excited about this new uranium bull market.
The company leaped from one penny to $10 per share during uranium’s last bull market. That’s a 1,000-fold increase.
That means a $1,000 investment could have exploded into $1 million.
Even the worst-performing companies in the uranium sector delivered 20-to-1 returns.
Uranium can deliver these almost unbelievable returns because of unique supply-and-demand quirks that create colossal bull and bear markets.
Doug, you recommended Paladin during the last cycle. What’s your take on uranium today?
Doug Casey: I wrote a very long and thorough article on uranium and nuclear power in October 1998 for my newsletter, where I recommended several uranium stocks, including Paladin, that subsequently—about two years later—all exploded upwards in value.
When the market wants into gold stocks it’s like trying to force the contents of Hoover Dam through a garden hose. In the case of uranium stocks, it’s more like a soda straw. It’s a very small market.
These wild imbalances in supply and demand, accompanied by equally wild swings in price, often surprise people who aren’t familiar with the resource business. But it is the very nature of the beast. And one of the reasons speculating in it can be so profitable—if your timing is good.
It’s really only possible to raise money to discover deposits and build mines when prices are high, because that’s when the typical investor is willing to finance companies and thinks he’ll make a killing. Of course the industry takes advantage of that window, resulting in an immense amount of new capacity.
Meanwhile, the same high prices that encourage new production also start to discourage new consumption. Although that’s only marginally true with uranium, because the cost of fuel is trivial—no more than 5% worst case—of overall costs. Which means by the time the new production hits the market, after a time lag of several years, both prices and physical demand have collapsed—as have the share prices of surviving companies.
That is when professionals who understand the way these things work open up their checkbooks, because the resource business—oil, precious metals, grains, uranium, you name it—is as cyclical as the seasons of the year. It’s just that each commodity has its own peculiarities.
The uranium market like that of most metals is highly cyclical and very, very volatile. The time therefore to buy is when prices are low, which is exactly when most people are afraid to act.
Recommended Link
Nick Giambruno: Now seems to be one of those times.
Doug Casey: Right now uranium is very cheap again. It’s selling for under the cost of production, once again. So, I like uranium a lot.
When commodities sell below production costs for long enough, the producers go bust, and supplies drop. Then prices rise and production eventually goes back up.
At the peak of the last uranium bull market, in 2007, there were about 300 uranium exploration companies. Now there might be a dozen, mostly dormant.
Higher uranium prices will predictably switch investor sentiment from bearish to bullish. Then, as Wall Street belatedly reacquaints itself with uranium, companies will get value for assets which nobody could care less about today. It’s an eternal cycle, and quite predicable—except for its timing.
Nick Giambruno: I think we’re in the very early stages of a new uranium bull market. I expect the investment returns to be at least as explosive as they were during previous bulls.
The price will likely overshoot, since it will take years for production to catch up with increased demand. And demand for uranium is certainly increasing. New nuclear power plants in China, India, Taiwan, and South Korea guarantee it.
Right now, 8% of global uranium demand comes from China. But China is expected to overtake the US as the world’s largest uranium consumer by 2030.
The Chinese think nuclear energy is the best solution to their huge air pollution problem. The increased demand from China alone should ensure that uranium prices rise.
Doug Casey: I doubt, especially in view of the fundamentals, that this will be the first bear market in history that’s not followed by a bull market. As the price of the commodity rises, the shares of producers should rise disproportionately. By 10 times? It’s happened before. And shares of exploration companies might increase exponentially.
I’m of the opinion that solar is—after 40 years of development—finally becoming economical, and will finally have its day in the sun, as it were. Solar finally makes practical sense.
That said, nuclear will remain the safest, cheapest, and cleanest form of mass power generation for a long time. Most people know nothing about the technology other than what they hear in a two-minute TV rant. Despite Einstein having been quite correct when he said, “After hydrogen, stupidity is the most common thing in the universe,” reality will win out in the end. Nuclear is the way to go.
Recommended Link
Kansas farm boy generates millions from his California “bunker”
He’s just an ordinary guy born on a farm in Kansas. He didn’t graduate from a fancy college. He doesn’t have an MBA. Yet he stumbled upon a “secret key” technique that allowed him to retire at 42… and still make more money in 8 hours… than most people make in a month. But Monday through Friday you’ll find him up by 4 am, in front of his computer… using his “secret key” to generate thousands of dollars per week… without touching stocks or bonds. He calls it his retirement hobby. Click here to see his “secret key” in action.
Nick Giambruno: I think Trump’s election signaled the birth of a new uranium bull market.
Trump likes nuclear energy. It fits right in with his “America First” platform. And it’s critical for securing the country’s energy independence.
He’s said, “I’m in favor of nuclear energy, very strongly in favor of nuclear energy.”
Trump is also enthusiastic about nuclear weapons. He has said:
The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to it senses regarding nukes.
The comment was aimed at Russia, the world’s other major nuclear power.
Russian President Vladimir Putin got the message. The same day he said, “We need to strengthen the military potential of strategic nuclear forces.”
Then Trump replied:
Let it be an arms race. We will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all.
The world’s two largest nuclear powers are calling for more nuclear weapons. This is a huge boon for the uranium market.
Doug Casey: Well. The last thing the world needs is more nuclear weapons. But that’s probably in the cards…
But with a little luck we’re on the verge of a renaissance of nuclear power in the US. More certain, and more important, however, is that there are hundreds more reactors being planned in China, India, Russia, and other Third World countries. There are tremendous advances being made in nuclear technology, as well.
In my opinion, now is the time to act. This is especially true because of Donald Trump’s election. He’s actively working to promote the building of new nuclear plants and ease the burdensome regulations on mining uranium.
Now this has sparked a new bull market in uranium, but so far, it’s just barely come off of historic lows. It could easily quadruple from current levels, and even then, it would still be below its previous highs.
The real profits; however, will be in the shares of uranium exploration and mining stocks. It’s not unrealistic to expect the group to move 10 to 1. Some individual stocks will do much better. In past markets there have actually been 100 to 1 shots. Uranium stocks now present a rare opportunity in my opinion.
Nick Giambruno: So Doug, how do we find the next Paladin-like returns that could turn $1,000 into $1 million?
Doug Casey: The trick is to find companies that have the business plan, the knowledge, and the resources (both geological and financial) to exploit it.
The type of company I want should now be buying marginal resources and have the ability to put them into production quickly, preferably using fixed price contracts. To do that, they must have knowledgeable, reputable uranium people in place now. In a few years the sector will again be flooded with Johnny-come-lately promoters. That’s not when you want to buy…
Last, let me reemphasize, the companies you want must have the financial backing to allow them to survive until the inevitable becomes imminent.
Nick Giambruno: Thanks, Doug.
Doug Casey: Thanks, Nick.
Nick Giambruno’s Note: Months ago, I recommended a “best of breed” uranium company in Crisis Investing. My subscribers are already sitting on a double-digit gain as of this writing.
Of course, I can’t tell you the name of this company. That would be unfair to subscribers. But I can tell you why I’m so bullish on it.
This company has the upside of a junior exploration company—think 10-bagger or better. But it’s very low-risk.
This is the kind of trade we look for in crisis markets. The risk/reward is skewed in our favor.
In the last uranium bull market, this company’s share price rocketed 3,600%. That’s a 10-bagger almost four times over. I expect it to do at least as well in the coming uranium boom. Click here for more details.

00:12 – Eleições alemãs

Em dia de calmaria nos mercados, o momento é propício para falar da crise política alemã e o que esta significa para os seus ativos.

Para isso temos de voltar um pouco atrás…

Em setembro, o resultado das eleições foi um bocadinho mais confuso do que aquilo que possa ter pensado na altura.

Relembro que o partido de Angela Merkel, a CDU, ganhou as eleições, mas com a pior votação desde 1949.

Conseguir um quarto mandato é uma conquista considerável para qualquer líder democrático. Permanecer, aparentemente, sadia ao fazê-lo é quase extraordinário.

Em termos práticos, os dois grandes partidos – a CDU e os Sociais Democratas – perderam imensos votos. A esquerda ganhou alguns.

Todavia, o grande vencedor foi o partido nacionalista AfD – agora o terceiro partido mais representativo do Bundestag.

____________________________________________________________

Já reservou o seu livro gratuito?

“Contra o Financismo”, o novo livro da Empiricus

Não deixe de ler o livro que vem ensinar a pessoa comum a investir. Aprenda o método mais prático e eficiente para investir em ações com o seu exemplar deste livro e ponha o seu dinheiro a trabalhar para si.

Reserve o seu exemplar AQUI.

____________________________________________________________

01:04 – Negociações complicadas

Compreensivelmente, ninguém na Alemanha está disposto a negociar com um partido de extrema-direita, pelo que a chanceler alemã tem tentado negociar uma geringonça, carinhosamente chamada de “coligação Jamaica” – cores dos três partidos envolvidos: a CDU (preto), o FDP (amarelo) e os Verdes.

O problema é que nunca foi uma aliança com pernas para andar.

Não é tão improvável como o CDS-PP cooperar com os Verdes, mas quase.

Depois de várias semanas de negociações, a bomba caiu na madrugada de segunda-feira, quando as conversações falharam e o líder do FDP, Christian Lidner, abandonou a mesa de negociações.

02:06 – Três portas

Então e agora?

Não sou um perito em política alemã, mas vejo três alternativas:

A CDU pode tentar uma coligação com os sociais democratas – que são liderados por Martin Schulz – mas o ex-presidente do Parlamento Europeu já veio a público dizer que não está interessado.

Pode tentar avançar com um governo minoritário em coligação com os Verdes, o que significa tentar juntar alianças improvisadas de cada vez que surgir algo importante, o que não é uma situação muito confortável.

Pode também pressionar por uma nova eleição.

O principal receio com esta última opção é que o AfD faça ainda melhor que os 13% que amealhou em setembro.

____________________________________________________________

Só para si…

Já ouviu falar no Contra o Financismo?

Clique no livro e descubra o que temos para lhe oferecer.

____________________________________________________________

03:09 – Menos chatices

Uma coisa parece clara: levará ainda algum tempo até que a Alemanha tenha um governo propriamente definido.

Então o que é que isso significa, na prática, para o preço dos ativos?

Por um lado, o BCE deve estar satisfeito – a instabilidade política na maior economia da zona Euro deverá manter a moeda única fraca contra o resto das principais divisas do mundo.

Por outro, com este alvoroço em casa, o contingente alemão do banco central, que passa a vida a reclamar por taxas mais altas e menos intervenção, pode perder algum poder de fogo.

Se conhece o amor do mercado pelos estímulos, sabe com certeza que isto são ótimas notícias para o preço dos ativos.

04:02 – Euro mais fraco

Ironicamente, o euro mais fraco significa, geralmente, ações alemãs mais fortes.

Eu não estou a dizer que deve aumentar a sua exposição à Alemanha…

… em rigor, a instabilidade política pode aumentar a volatilidade no curto prazo.

Gráfico FTSE 100 – Fonte: Yahoo Finance

Porém, se tivermos em conta a reação da bolsa londrina ao Brexit e a subsequente desvalorização da libra, então não espere pelos saldos na bolsa.

Anyone who’s ever played a pinball machine can attest to the fact that the player easily becomes wrapped up in it, to the point of the exclusion of all else happening around him. He hits the flippers rapidly, glancing up from time to time at his increasing score. It becomes irresistible to jiggle the table frequently, in an effort to get the ball to go where the player wants it to go.

And, of course, every player is familiar with the disappointment that comes when he’s overplayed his body English and the machine stops suddenly, lighting up a sign that says, “Tilt! Game Over.”

Much of the world is now embroiled in an economic game similar to pinball. The stakes are becoming ever greater, the flipper buttons are being pressed ever faster, and those who are desperately attempting to keep the collapsing system going are shoving the table ever more recklessly.

Recommended Link

Silicon Valley Rocket Scientist’s December 19th Prediction Could Lead to 35,000% Growth
Jeff Brown is a real-life rocket scientist and one of the most tuned-in angel investors in Silicon Valley. Not only has Jeff been an executive for companies like Qualcomm and NXP Semiconductors, but he’s also completed 89 private deals. Right now, he’s predicting that a new biotech breakthrough could skyrocket this market niche 35,000%… All because of a little-known FDA anomaly happening around December 19. Click here to see him lay out his bold prediction in full detail.

At this point in the world economy, the number of possible triggers that could take the system down is growing ever more rapidly. And, for those who are paying attention, the list of dominoes that we’ll see fall is becoming ever more starkly apparent. Let’s have a look at just some of the more basic dominoes:

  • Creditor countries dumping US Treasuries back into the US market. (This has already begun and will continue until the dollar crashes.)
  • Cessation of the US dollar as the petrodollar. (This is about to begin, but will take several years to play out fully.)
  • Economic sanctions by the US against Russia and China (that are unlikely to have the support of the US’s allies).
  • Implementation of tariffs, resulting in a tariff war.
  • A rise in interest rates (as was consciously created in 1929 by the Fed in order to trigger a timed crash).
  • Bursting of the bond market bubble.
  • A major stock market crash.
  • Dramatic increase in mortgage defaults.
  • A spike in commodity prices, coinciding with a drop in asset values (inflation and deflation at the same time—the worst possible combination).
  • Collapse of the paper gold market.
  • A switch to the new IMF cryptocurrency and a major effort to end the use of cash. (This will succeed to some extent, but will create a worldwide monetary black market.)
  • US defaults on its debt. (This, too, will occur over several years.)
  • Collapse of the dollar.

Many of these events will be black swans. As can be expected, some of the events will be sudden, whilst others will take time to play out. In addition, although they’re likely to occur roughly in order, several will be in play at any given time.

Recommended Link

Congressional Bill: Massive Bull Market Dead Ahead
Congress is on the verge of igniting a bull market that could be 8 times greater than any in U.S history. But not in any market you might expect. Not the Dow, Nasdaq, or even gold. Instead, it’s a unique collection of 900+ companies that trade like ordinary stocks. One Goldman Sachs insider says 4,900% growth could be on the horizon… Sending this little-known market soaring in coming months… and turning early investors into a new class of millionaires virtually overnight. All starting with this obscure new bill.

Although each of these events can be anticipated, they won’t come with warning notices. Their actual occurrences will be unheralded. (As an example, when a stock market crash occurs, investors will wake up to discover that it’s occurred whilst they were sleeping.)

And, just as in pinball, the end of the game will come quite suddenly. The moment that the player will know that it’s “Game Over” will be when he goes to his ATM and finds that the screen is dark. The machine has been made inoperative overnight. Annoyed, he’ll go to the next-nearest ATM, but will find that that one, too, is shut down. He’ll go to others and, at some point, will realise that they’re all shut down.

Without spending cash in his wallet, he’ll then go to the local gas station or supermarket and attempt to pay with his credit cards but will find that they’ve all been made inactive. In trying to sort out the problem with the manager, he’ll be told that all credit cards for all his customers have been denied that day.

The realization will suddenly hit that money has ceased to flow. For how long? The television news programmes will state that it will be temporary, but they don’t define “temporary.”

Those few individuals who understood that an economic crisis was brewing will take inventory of how much cash they have remaining in their wallets and how much they’ve stashed at home, and realise that this total now represents their total purchasing power.

Overnight, wealth is no longer measured in saleable assets, since, if virtually no one has spending money, they have no means of payment. Therefore, the fellow who thought that, if he found himself in a pinch, he could always sell the Harley in the driveway, or perhaps the family boat, for some quick cash, can no longer locate a buyer who can pay him—at any price.

Of course, many people will do all they can to contact their bankers, demanding that they be allowed to remove their money on deposit and extract the contents of their safe deposit boxes, but they’ll receive a recording, saying, “We’re sorry for the inconvenience, but the bank will be temporarily closed until further notice.”

At this point, “wealth” will change its definition to include only the cash in hand, plus whatever might be bartered.

Recently, I received an email from an associate in Canada, who asked, “When will I know when I really have to make a move?” My answer was, “You won’t. But there will be an actual day when you’ll know that you’ve waited too long and it’s now too late. That day will be the day that you visit the ATM and find it closed.”

That’s it. “Game Over.”

So, are we all doomed? Well, no, not at all. Those who are proactive can remove themselves from the system now, before the system reaches the “Tilt!”

If the reader lives in one of the jurisdictions that’s likely to be the most impacted (EU, US, Canada, etc.), he would be wise to liquidate his possessions there and move the proceeds to a jurisdiction that’s less likely to be impacted and which has a long reputation for economic stability. He should place his wealth (no matter how great or little) in precious metals and real estate overseas—again, in a safer jurisdiction.

He should retain some money (in cash and precious metals) at home, or nearby—enough to cover a few months’ expenses.

If he can afford to, he should then create a bolt-hole in a jurisdiction that he can go to quickly, should the crisis overtake him.

However, even those who recognize that their home country may soon become an economic prison camp are likely to dither, failing to prepare adequately. Sadly, they’re likely to find themselves in the position of the fellow in the photo above, discovering that “Game Over” has arrived before he could ready himself.

00:23 – Desta vez é diferente

“Desta vez é diferente” é, talvez, o chavão mais popular nos mercados financeiros durante os períodos de grande euforia.

Curiosamente, também é um dos mais perigosos.

Para a grande maioria é uma justificação para comprar a preços absurdos.

A necessidade de controlo das pessoas leva-as a procurarem (e inventarem) razões que confirmem a sua própria tese e a ignorarem toda a informação que a contradiz.

01:22 – Finanças comportamentais

O tema está bem documentado pelas finanças comportamentais.

As pessoas tendem a reunir informações de forma seletiva ou a interpretá-las de forma tendenciosa.

Tal efeito é mais forte em questões de forte carga emocional (o dinheiro sendo uma delas) e em crenças profundamente enraizadas.

Tendemos – também me incluo aqui – a interpretar evidências ambíguas de forma a sustentar as nossas posições preexistentes.

02:33 – Entendimento e racionalização

É curioso como as pessoas não se rendem e mantêm-se apegadas às tentativas de entendimento e racionalização.

Por que é que falo disto neste momento? Por duas razões essenciais.

A primeira porque à medida que a Empiricus cresce, chegam novos leitores/investidores à caça da nova ação mágica…

… aquela que só ele (e os fóruns de ações) conhecem, pronta a ser comprada e multiplicar por 10x.

A segunda refere-se a uma questão conjuntural.

Em conversas com os nossos leitores, tenho notado um crescente interesse pelas ações da moda.

Aquelas que negoceiam com valuations bem acima da sua média histórica.

03:44 – Carro em andamento

No curto prazo são normalmente estas que tem um melhor desempenho…

É como tentar apanhar um carro em andamento.

Mesmo que não tenha combustível, com a força do movimento ele ainda nos leva uns bons quilómetros.

O problema é quando acaba a gasolina e fica apeado.

Assim, o melhor mesmo é comprar boas empresas a preços atrativos que têm o depósito cheio.

04:09 – Revista aos mercados

Para terminar uma breve revista aos mercados…

Empurrados pelas notícias que apontam para uma grande coligação entre a CDU, o partido de Merkel, e o SPD, de Martin Schulz, os mercados vivem dia de disposição a risco.

A procura por maiores retornos em detrimento da segurança atravessa alocações numa esfera global.

Euro, commodities e bolsas em alta ligeira.

Feitas as contas da semana, parece que o mercado parou de cair. Bom momento para refletir nas suas posições e posicionar-se para aproveitar a oportunidade de uma vida.

Termine a sua semana com…

:. Está na hora de ganhar dinheiro a sério

:. Já teve oportunidade de assistir ao nosso curso de criptomoedas?

:. Obtenha retornos de 20% em 365 dias

As Doug Casey has correctly noted, the prime directive of any organism—whether it’s an amoeba or a person or a corporation or a government—is to survive.

That’s why the US government protects the petrodollar so zealously. It needs the system to survive.

World leaders who have challenged the petrodollar recently have ended up dead…

Why Everyone Uses the US Dollar… for Now

In the 1970s, the US government struck a series of deals with Saudi Arabia, creating the petrodollar system. The US promised to coddle and protect the Saudi kingdom. And, in exchange, Saudi Arabia would use its dominant position in OPEC to ensure that all oil transactions happened in US dollars.

Until recently, virtually anyone who wanted to import oil from anycountry needed US dollars to pay for it.

The dollar is just a middleman here. But countries and businesses use it in countless transactions amounting to trillions of dollars that have nothing to do with US products or services.

Plus, if foreign countries are already using dollars for oil, it’s just easier to use the dollar for other international trade. That’s why, in addition to oil sales, the US dollar is used for about 80% of all international transactions.

Take Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi, for example. Each led a large oil-producing country—Iraq and Libya, respectively. And both tried to sell their oil for something other than US dollars, before US military interventions led to their deaths.

In October 2000, Saddam had started to sell Iraqi oil for euros only. Iraq said it would no longer accept dollars for oil because it did not want to deal “in the currency of the enemy.”

A little over two years later, the US invaded. Immediately after Baghdad fell to US forces, all Iraqi oil sales were switched back to dollars.

Thanks to WikiLeaks’ release of Hillary Clinton’s emails, we know that protecting the petrodollar—not humanitarian concerns—was a primary reason for overthrowing Libya’s Gaddafi.

According to her leaked emails, the US (and France) feared that Gaddafi would use Libya’s vast gold reserves to back a pan-African currency. This gold-backed currency would have been used to buy and sell oil in global markets. Also, it would have likely displaced a version of the French franc that’s used in Central and Western Africa.

The US and France backed a rebellion, both militarily and financially, that overthrew Gaddafi in 2011.

After Gaddafi’s death, plans for the gold-backed currency—along with Libya’s 4.6 million ounces of gold—vanished.

Of course there were other reasons the US toppled Saddam and Gaddafi. But protecting the petrodollar was a serious consideration, at the very least.

Putin Is a Tougher Adversary

The dollar’s special status gives Uncle Sam tremendous leverage. So it’s no surprise that Russia wants to undermine the petrodollar system.

Russian President Vladimir Putin summed it up this way:

Russia shares the BRICS countries’ concerns over the unfairness of the global financial and economic architecture, which does not give due regard to the growing weight of the emerging economies. We are ready to work together with our partners to promote international financial regulation reforms and to overcome the excessive domination of the limited number of reserve currencies.

Essentially, Putin is saying they all want to ditch the dollar.

That’s largely because the US uses the dollar as a political weapon. For example, the US tried to sanction Russia for its actions in Crimea and Ukraine. These sanctions made it harder for Russia to access the US dollar–based financial system. So of course Russia is going to push for an alternative.

Shortly after the sanctions, Russia struck a massive deal to sell oil and gas to China for yuan. The deal totally bypassed the US financial system… and any sanctions.

China’s Permanent Bypass Around the US Dollar

Russia is the world’s largest energy producer. China is the world’s largest energy importer. Normally, they would trade with each other exclusively in US dollars.

But, as I’ve told you in recent weeks, China is now introducing a more permanent way around that.

I call it China’s “Golden Alternative” to the petrodollar. It’s a streamlined way for Russia and everyone else to sell oil to China for yuan—or effectively gold.

China’s “Golden Alternative” to the Petrodollar

China is launching a practical and attractive alternative to the petrodollar system. It will allow anyone in the world to trade oil for gold. It will also totally bypass the US dollar.

Here’s how it will work…

The Shanghai International Energy Exchange (INE) is introducing a crude oil futures contract denominated in Chinese yuan. It will allow oil producers to sell their oil for yuan.

Of course, China knows most oil producers don’t want a large reserve of yuan. So producers will be able to efficiently convert it into physical gold through gold exchanges in Shanghai and Hong Kong.

Bottom line, two of the biggest players in the global energy market are totally bypassing the petrodollar system.

Informed observers say Russia is already converting a large portion of its yuan earnings to gold.

Of course, other countries are interested in sidestepping the US financial system and US sanctions, too. China’s Golden Alternative will give anyone the option to do just that.

This will make the US dollar a much less effective political weapon.

Other countries on Washington’s naughty list are enthusiastically signing up. Iran, another major oil producer, is accepting yuan as payment. So is Venezuela, which has the world’s largest oil reserves.

I think others will soon follow. From the perspective of an oil producer, it’s a no-brainer.

With China’s Golden Alternative, an oil producer can participate in the world’s largest market and try to capture more market share. It can also easily convert and repatriate its proceeds into gold, an international form of money with no political risk.

But this doesn’t apply to one critical holdout… Saudi Arabia.

Recommended Link

The Greatest Bull Market in History Is About to Make Some Investors Rich

This little-known market is already worth $100 billion… But one Goldman Sachs insider expects it to be a $5 trillion market in the next few years. That’s a 4,900% growth surge in a few short years… But it’s already minting a new class of millionaires virtually overnight. Pete A. from Richmond, Virginia, collected over $200,000 already… and 60-year-old business owner Mark Richardson earned $200k in only 6 months! 45-year-old doctor Jon Mattson turned $250 into $125,000… “Unbelievable…” he says. It’s all thanks to these tiny $0.01 plays. Click here to get the full story.

Twisting the Saudis’ Arm

Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest oil exporter. A lot of that oil goes to China, the world’s largest importer.

Beijing still reluctantly pays for Saudi crude in US dollars. The Saudis won’t have it any other way, at least for now.

This bothers China. It can only import Saudi crude by obtaining and then using US dollars. And that, of course, means it has to stay in Washington’s good graces.

Trump’s Treasury secretary really drove this point home recently. He threatened to kick China out of the US dollar system if it didn’t crack down on North Korea.

China would rather not depend on an adversary like this. This is one of the main reasons it’s launching the Golden Alternative.

Saudi Arabia, however, refuses to participate. It won’t sell its oil in anything but US dollars because that would break its longstanding petrodollar agreement with the US.

When China, Russia, and others trade oil for yuan, it’s a significant blow to the petrodollar. But if Saudi Arabia switched to yuan, it would take out the petrodollar… and cause an immediate financial panic in the US.

The truth is selling oil for yuan would cost Saudi Arabia a whole lot.

It would immediately lose American diplomatic and military protection. Then the media and think tanks would quickly start pounding the table for the US military to force democracy on Riyadh.

Last year Trump said, “If Saudi Arabia was without the cloak of American protection, I don’t think it would be around.”

He’s absolutely correct.

Of course, the Saudis know all of this. So they’ve been on a short leash… until recently.

In a surprise move, Saudi King Salman recently became the first sitting Saudi monarch to ever visit Russia.

Until recently, the visit would have been unthinkable. Saudi Arabia has been one of the US’ closest allies since the petrodollar system started in the 1970s.

Meanwhile, Russia and Saudi Arabia have been enemies for decades. Most recently, the Saudis and Russians have been on opposite sides of the Syrian Civil War.

That’s why King Salman’s historic visit to Moscow is so remarkable. The Saudis are clearly hedging their bets against the US and the petrodollar system.

Saudi Arabia is now drifting closer to Russia.

The Saudis have committed to invest up to $10 billion in various Russian sectors. But, even more significantly, they’ve agreed to buy the S-400 missile system, Russia’s top line air defense system, as part of a $3 billion weapons purchase.

This deal signals a geopolitical earthquake. The Saudis have neverbought Russian military equipment before.

Ever since the birth of the petrodollar, the Saudis have depended on American military protection. After all, it’s what they get in return for pricing their oil in dollars.

The S-400 system deal suggests the Saudis are hedging their bets. First, they’re not buying an American system. Second, they’re buying a Russian system that’s capable of deterring an American attack.

Saudi Arabia is making significant moves to give itself alternatives to American protection.

At the same time, China is cutting back on Saudi crude.

A few years ago, Saudi oil made up over 25% of Chinese oil imports. They were Beijing’s No. 1 supplier. Today, the Saudis’ market share has dropped below 15%.

In other words, the Saudis are losing massive market share and getting pushed out of the biggest oil market in the world. This is mainly because they refuse to sell oil to China in yuan.

China has made itself clear. It’s willing to expand business with anyone who will accept yuan as payment.

Today, Russia has overtaken Saudi Arabia as China’s top supplier. Its share of the lucrative Chinese market has grown from 5% to over 15%.

Russia’s enthusiastic acceptance of yuan as payment is the main reason for this shift.

In the meantime, Angola, an African oil producer, has also come on board. The country now accepts yuan as payment for its oil exports to China. It even made the Chinese yuan its second legal currency in 2015.

Chinese imports from Angola have shot up since. It’s now China’s No. 2 supplier, after Russia.

None of this bodes well for the petrodollar system.

The Saudis have two choices… rip up the petrodollar or get shut out of the world’s most lucrative oil market.

One way or another—and probably soon—the Chinese will find a way to compel the Saudis to accept yuan. The sheer size of the Chinese market makes it impossible for Saudi Arabia to ignore China’s demands indefinitely.

What to Watch For…

China might not convince the Saudis to ditch the petrodollar system tomorrow. But it’s making significant progress.

A few months ago, Saudi Arabia announced it was willing to issue Panda bonds to finance its government spending deficit. (Panda bonds are yuan-denominated bonds from non-Chinese issuers that are sold in China.)

This is remarkable. The Saudis’ currency is pegged to the US dollar. Up until this point, they’ve exclusively used US dollars for all of their major financial initiatives.

Issuing debt in yuan—instead of US dollars—is a significant move. It means Saudi Arabia is drifting closer to China.

Also, the Saudis recently inaugurated the massive Yasref refinery in the Saudi city of Yanbu. The refinery is an $8.5 billion joint venture between Saudi Aramco and China’s Sinopec.

These are noticeable steps. But the Saudis still haven’t given China what it really wants—oil for yuan.

However, it could happen soon…

The Largest IPO in History

In the coming months, the Saudis plan to float a 5% stake in Saudi Aramco, the state oil company.

Saudi Aramco is the most valuable company in the world. It will likely be the biggest equity offering ever. It could triple, or even quadruple, Alibaba’s current record initial public offering (IPO) of $25 billion.

The IPO’s success will depend on Saudi Arabia recruiting big cornerstone investors. But so far, Western investors haven’t shown a lot of enthusiasm.

For China, however, it could be the perfect opportunity to buy political influence in Saudi Arabia.

If China bought a large stake in the Aramco IPO, it would help cement its relationship with Saudi Arabia. It would also put more distance between the Saudis and the Americans.

And critically, it would give the Chinese more leverage to compel the Saudis to accept yuan for oil.

China is in the process of negotiating not just a 5% stake, but potentially a larger one.

Bottom line…the Saudis haven’t made a clean break with the US yet. However, they are drifting toward China financially and Russia militarily.

The Saudis are clearly setting up the option to dump the petrodollar.

If the Saudis sell oil to China in yuan, it would kill the petrodollar overnight. However, short of that, things still look very dire for the petrodollar.

The petrodollar system is facing serious erosion, thanks in large part to China’s Golden Alternative. That’s already baked into the cake.

And with that, severe inflation in the US is a certainty.

Financial repression is a devious tactic.

At some point, every heavily indebted government uses it. It’s inevitable. And no entity on the planet is more indebted than the US government.

So, understanding what financial repression is and how to protect yourself from it is critical—whether you live in the US or any other indebted country.

Financial repression is a big umbrella term. You’ve probably heard it thrown around. Here’s a refresher from the Financial Times:

Financial repression is a term used to describe measures sometimes used by governments to boost their coffers and/or reduce debt. These measures include the deliberate attempt to hold down interest rates to below inflation, representing a tax on savers and a transfer of benefits from lenders to borrowers.

Financial repression is also used to describe measures to facilitate a domestic market for government debt and the imposition of capital controls. The combined effect of all these measures means funds are channeled to the government that would otherwise flow elsewhere.

The Financial Repression Authority recently had me on their show to discuss how this is playing out right now.

I’m sharing our discussion below.

If, like me, you value privacy and personal liberty, you won’t want to miss it.

Financial Repression Authority (FRA): Let’s begin with your thoughts on the war on cash. Where do you see that trending?

Nick Giambruno: I’m not going to mince words. The war on cash is evil. It’s an all-out assault on your privacy.

George Orwell once wrote, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.”

Not exactly a cheery thought. Unfortunately, we may be headed toward this dark future… and soon.

It’s a world where privacy is dead, where the government knows everything about you. And we’re almost there.

The government already knows what you watch on TV, what you read on the internet, whom you call, and everything you do on your smartphone and computer.

It has a record of every penny you’ve ever earned, saved, borrowed, or spent. It knows where you’ve been, where you are, and where you’re going.

This is all possible thanks to the mountain of laws and regulations that sprouted from the war on (some) drugs, the war on terror, and so forth. Over the years, these schemes have incrementally destroyed your privacy.

Now, with the war on cash, the government is going in for the kill.

There’s not much about your life the government doesn’t already know. The last vestiges of privacy may vanish very soon. Once that happens, governments will have almost unbreakable control over the individual.

This is exactly the opposite of how a free society should work.

The war on cash does not protect you from drug dealers or terrorists. It only helps the government seize more power. This is why proponents of big government reflexively support it.

There’s also a psychological aspect to this relentless anti-privacy campaign. The government and its media allies have convinced the average person that “privacy” is a dirty word.

They’ve duped people into believing that only criminals and wrongdoers want privacy. “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about,” as the popular, but wrongheaded, adage goes.

Many have forgotten that privacy is fundamental to preserving human dignity and protecting individuals from government overreach.

Financial privacy is by far the most demonized aspect of privacy.

This is a huge clue. Governments wouldn’t hate financial privacy so much if it weren’t so important to individual liberty.

Politicians around the world see people as milk cows. They merely exist to be squeezed to the last drop. That’s why politicians are so eager to kill financial privacy. They’re building a giant tax farm and erecting electric fences to keep the cows and their milk from escaping.

Overzealous governments have been attacking financial privacy for decades. Now, they’re within striking distance of killing it once and for all.

The war on cash is their final push.

The death of privacy in general, and financial privacy in particular, will have far-reaching sociopolitical consequences. It will irrevocably skew the balance of power in favor of the government and against the individual.

I call it “the new feudalism.”

A world without privacy is a giant step backward for human freedom. It’s the new Dark Ages that Orwell grimly predicted.

That’s why the war on cash is such a disturbing trend. But it’s a growing trend, nonetheless—not just in the US, but around the world.

FRA: Do you see governments getting involved with cryptocurrencies as part of the war on cash?

Nick Giambruno: First, it’s critically important to distinguish between a decentralized private cryptocurrency—like bitcoin—and a centralized cryptocurrency, which the government controls.

Bitcoin is a decentralized, non-state currency. Anyone in the world can use it.

In short, it’s financial kryptonite against the war on cash.

Bitcoin doesn’t use the traditional financial system. It has no central authority. Instead, it runs on a decentralized network scattered around the world. If you take certain steps, you can essentially make anonymous transactions.

You can take any amount of bitcoin in and out of any country. You don’t need permission from any government. You can send it—or take it with you—across borders as often as you want. And there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

With bitcoin, there’s no central location for a SWAT team to raid. There’s no “capo” to arrest. The government can do nothing but play an endless game of whack-a-mole across the globe.

It’s basically impossible for the US government, the Chinese government, or any government to kill bitcoin without shutting down the entire internet… and keeping it turned off.

I’ve seen this firsthand in Latin America. Governments there use capital controls to trap money within their borders so they have more to confiscate. Bitcoin helps people get around this because governments can’t freeze, seize, or block bitcoin transactions.

This is why bitcoin is such a disruptive and exciting technology. Just look at the surge in the bitcoin trading volume in crisis-ridden Venezuela recently.

Bitcoin’s resilience to government interference terrifies politicians everywhere. That’s a wonderful thing. They can (and will) try to regulate bitcoin, but they will fail.

There’s an ongoing demonization of private cryptocurrencies. It’s similar to the war on cash. The folks pushing the war on cash tell us ludicrous tropes, like only drug dealers and terrorists use large amounts of cash.

They say the same lies about private cryptocurrencies…

“Only terrorists and drug dealers use bitcoin,” and so forth.

What they’re really doing is laying the groundwork to further restrict cash and cryptocurrencies by demonizing them.

FRA: Do you think that governments will allow private-based cryptocurrencies to exist?

Nick Giambruno: First, let me say that it’s terrible for some bureaucrat to threaten people with state violence for voluntarily using their currency of choice.

But, back to your question…

The government doesn’t have a choice. It can try to control and regulate cryptocurrencies. But I don’t think the US government will have much more success than, say, Venezuela does in trying to control currencies that they don’t like their citizens to use. The cat is out of the bag.

It’s also instructive to look at file sharing on BitTorrent, a similarly decentralized technology.

BitTorrent has been around for over 15 years. Despite the US government’s best efforts to shut it down, it’s still easily accessible.

FRA: Do you think central banks will promote the war on cash to make implementing negative interest rates easier?

Nick Giambruno: Absolutely.

Central bankers are a bunch of witch doctors who’ve convinced everyone they’re neurosurgeons. So don’t place your confidence in them.

Instead, I recommend thinking for yourself. You don’t need any special training to be your own economist. You just need a healthy dose of common sense.

Negative interest rates are a bizarre, perverse concept. Basically, someone is getting paid to borrow money. It’s completely backwards.

Negative rates could not exist in a free market with voluntary interactions and sound money.

They’re only possible because of legalized fraud, government coercion, and central economic planning.

If you don’t like losing money to negative interest rates, you can certainly stash your cash under the mattress. As a practical matter, this limits how far governments and central banks can take negative rates.

The more it costs to store money at the bank, the less people will do it.

Of course, central bankers don’t want you to withdraw money from the bank. This is a big reason behind their totalitarian war on cash.

On a related note, you don’t even own the fiat Federal Reserve Notes you deposit in your bank account. Once you deposit paper money at the bank, it’s no longer your property. It belongs to the bank.

What you own is a promise from the bank to repay you. That’s a very different thing from cash in hand. Yet 99.9% of people wrongly conflate the two.

The currency in your bank account is really just an unsecured liability. Technically, you’re a creditor of the bank.

And that means a bank bail-in would probably burn you.

A bail-in is when a bank recapitalizes itself by tapping its creditors. That includes all of its average Joe depositors.

We saw this happen in Cyprus in 2013. Since then, bail-ins have been codified into law in the EU, Canada, and the US.

The next time big banks get into trouble—which is a virtual certainty with the fraudulent fractional reserve system—they’ll dip into depositors’ accounts to try to keep the Ponzi scheme running.

Lastly, the US already has negative interest rates.

While interest rates in the US are nominally positive, when you factor in the real rate of inflation, they are clearly negative.

Editor’s Note: Politicians and central bank “witch doctors” are threatening more than your privacy. Together, their schemes have created an unparalleled hazard to your financial security. Find out all the details in a special video with Doug Casey and his team.